| |
Forgotten
Masterpiece
By
Noel Vera
The
Idiot (Hakuchi, 1951)
Dir: Akira Kurosawa
Akira Kurosawa's
1951 film "The Idiot," his adaptation of Dostoevsky's novel, is pretty
much forgotten now, or is rarely mentioned when talking about the
filmmaker or his masterworks. The film is seriously flawed--about
a hundred minutes were chopped off before the film was released, and
you can see Kurosawa trying to make up for this with lengthy expository
titles and voiceover narrations, trying to explain the characters'
complex relationships in a few minutes of screen time. Critics who
do get past the rushed, awkward beginning note the film's literalness,
its director's apparent need to get as much of the novel as possible
up on the big screen.
Kurosawa
transposed Russia to Hokkaido, for several possible reasons: Hokkaido,
located at the northernmost tip of Japan, is in terms of landscape,
architecture, and clothing considered the most Western-looking of
all of Japan's islands; in wintertime, with everyone decked out in
fur, the streets looks particularly European. Kurosawa may have been
looking for more than a Russian-style snowstorm, though: a master
of weather on film, he recruits the various manifestations of winter
to help express his characters' inner states, from gentle snowfall
to harsh sleet to mysterious fog. Snow and ice make fantastical shapes
in the form of frozen cascades, thick blankets, grotesque mushroom
growths; his characters walk through them as if through an enchanted
forest. Kurosawa has made expressive use of summer heat before ("Stray
Dog" comes to mind), but wintertime is weather made visible, even
palpable, and Kurosawa makes full use of the season's visual possibilities
in this production, possibly more so than in any other of his films.
 |
|
The film finally
starts to be great in the scene where an evening party is thrown
by Tohata (Ejiro Yanagi), the wealthy man who supports Takeo Nasu
(Setsuko Hara, as the novel's Nastassia), and is presumably her
lover. The first shot is a stunner: the camera pulls back from a
huge rattan chair, and through the chair's high, soaring backrest
we see Nasu sitting in the middle of a greenhouse, in the middle
of a snowstorm (the rattan's weave and the greenhouse's metal frame
are a visual symbols of her imprisonment by Tohata, of course--her
status as caged bird (she's wrapped in black like a raven) and exotic
flower, blooming in the midst of winter). She's tense, upset--Tohata
is marrying her off to Koyama (Minoru Chiaki, playing the novel's
Ganya) with a dowry of 600,000 yen; Kurosawa indicates her tension
by wiping the frame several times, each successive wipe showing
her heading for the wet bar, drinking a glass of champagne, then
another, then another.
Then follows
a wonderful wordless sequence where Nasu sits at the couch, silent,
while the three men in her life stand around her worried. Ono (the
great Takashi Shimura), whose machinations are about to come to
fruition that night (he arranged the marriage) looks at her suitor
Kayama who, glancing at Nasu, throws a look back at Ono; Ono turns
to Tohata, who stares at Nasu, still unmoving (the music here, which
sets the pace of Kurosawa's precisely timed cuts, is as lovely as
it is thrilling). It's obvious what's on all three's minds: What
is she thinking? Will she agree to this engagement, or will she
make trouble?
Cut to an outside shot where the camera glides sideways through
the snow, peering through the window and the couples dancing within,
catching a glimpse of the seated Nasu along the way. Cut back inside
to the motionless Nasu, then (in reverse order) to the staring Tohata,
who looks back at Ono, who looks back at Kayama. The tension is
broken; Ono grins as if saying: "she'll come around." Then the maid
announces that Kameda (Masayuki Mori) has arrived. Kameda is Dostoevsky's
Prince Mishkin, his idiot, his holy fool, who will throw the three
men's plans into complete disarray; only now do you realize that
that shot outside in the snow was a glimpse of Nasu through Kameda's
eyes. What was she thinking? Kurosawa without our knowing it has
already given us the answer--she's thinking of the man in the snow,
looking at her through the window as he approached the door.
It's a long
scene that gets better as it goes along. At one point there's a
startling shot of Nasu hovering vulturelike in front of a valuable
vase before she knocks it to the floor; later Akama (Toshiro Mifune
as the novel's Rogozhin--a perfect match) arrives to throw a million
yen on the table for Nasu's hand; still later Kayama stands before
the fireplace, rigid, wide-eyed, while the same million yen burns
to ashes. The scene, incidentally, may be Chiaki's finest as an
actor: he's been a genial, even funny presence in many of Kurosawa's
films, but here he really shines; Dostoevsky a master at measuring
the height and depth of a man's dignity or depravity, often both
simultaneously, challenges Chiaki, and he rises--pale, trembling--to
the occasion.

Then there's
the climax, a confrontation between Nasu and Ayako (Yoshiko Kuga
as the novel's Aglaia) with Kameda as the prize (please skip this
and the next paragraph if you plan to see the film). Kurosawa prepares
for it elaborately enough, with parallel scenes of Nasu and Kameda
expressing their fears to their respective mates, Akama and Ayako,
about the meeting. Kameda and Ayako ascend the stairs to Akama's
room, with Akama looking down at them through a stained-glass window
(their ascent reminds you of a convict and her guard's climb up
to the gallows' platform).
Nasu's senses are so keyed up she can hear them coming even if she's
sitting facing away from the stairs. She stands; she turns. Her
eyes widen at the sight of Kameda, the man she hopelessly loves;
her eyes widen further at the sight of Ayako, his fiancé.
Ayako's eyes are downcast--presumably out of modesty, though you
suspect it's more out of fear. The two women sit down. Ayako edges
away from Nasu about an inch; Nasu just keeps staring at her. Kameda
steps forward, alarmed at what he senses between the two; Akama
leans back amused, interested in what might happen next. Ayako pulls
a bit of hair back with her hand, and Nasu visibly reacts to this
seeming effrontery--how dare this girl move under her gaze?
The gesture
gives Ayako the courage to look at Nasu. When their eyes meet, it's
Hara's moment: her eyes are huge, brows swept upwards at the edges
like gull wings--she looks like a feathered demon; Yoshiko's Ayako
can barely stand up to the stare, but does, somehow--her expression
gains ferocity in response. Kurosawa cuts to a shot of the room's
wood-burning stove, flaring up from the icy wind (I wouldn't be
surprised to learn that one reason why Kurosawa turned Russia in
summer to Hokkaido in winter is just so he could include that fiery
stove). Ayako looks away first; Nasu's eyes relax and take on a
hooded look.
At one point Nasu laughs, a wild, despairing laugh--it's perhaps
the strangest moment in the whole film, because Kurosawa doesn't
show her laughing; we just hear a high screech, almost a stuttering
shriek (this is the second time; the first is when she laughs at
Tohata's party). Does Kurosawa cut away because he felt Hara couldn't
do it (though assuming the sound is her voice, I'd say she can)?
Or is cutting away his way of suggesting that it's too much to put
onscreen?
 |
|
As Kinji Kameda,
Masayuki Mori (he played the husband in "Rashomon") keeps his frail
hands under his chin, a gesture that emphasizes his wide eyes and
huge forehead; the overall impression is of someone childlike, helpless.
As Taeko Nasu, Setsuko Hara gives us a performance worlds away from
her serene spinsters in Yasujiro Ozu's films--this Nasu (or Nastassia)
is a passionate, fire-breathing woman, totally in the grip of her
tempestuous emotions, unable to tolerate anyone who dares defy her,
yet willing to surrender to anyone capable of understanding her.
Toshiro Mifune as Denkichi Akama is ostensibly the most violent
of the cast of characters, but his violence really feeds off of
Nasu's perversity and Kameda's innocence; in Dostoevsky's upside-down
yet totally familiar world (he wouldn't have so much power over
our imaginations if his characters weren't so recognizable) Akama
may be as innocent a pawn as Kameda.
Dostoevsky's
novels often take a philosophical principle or proposal then "test"
it or explore its various consequences in dramatic terms; Kurosawa,
in films like "Rashomon" and "Ikiru" has done much of the same.
"The Idiot" might be described as Dostoevsky's attempt to show us
how a saintly innocent would act or be treated in our cynical, often
malicious world of today--just the kind of proposition Kurosawa
might apply to one of his characters in his films. His adaptation
of "The Idiot" is arguably his most direct and comprehensive attempt
at adapting Dostoevsky's method--perhaps too direct, one might argue:
Kurosawa is possibly more successful streamlining a Dostoevskyian
character and letting him loose onscreen for a relatively short
two-plus hours (Watanabe in "Ikiru"), than in trying to include
every character and subplot in a novel, where said novel really
needs a mini-series to do it justice.
But Kurosawa
has never been known for timidity or caution, and in fact his need
to cram more and more in his pictures (in direct opposition to films
about "green tea over rice"--his dismissive (and more than a little
unfair) description of Ozu's films) has resulted in at least one
masterpiece, the massive two-hundred minute "Seven Samurai," arguably
the greatest action film ever made. One wonders what his two-hundred
sixty-six minute "The Idiot" would have been like (it exceeds "Samurai's"
running time by over an hour); as is, one can't help but admire
this, his butchered one hundred sixty-six minute version, for its
passion and reckless beauty.
Note: First
published in Businessworld, 9/9/05.
Comments? Email me at noelbotevera@hotmail.com.
|